Independent verification of WTSR compliance
An audit establishes whether the documented system matches how work is authorised and carried out on site.
We audit against your own document suite and against current industry expectations, then report findings ranked by risk with a route to closing each one.
This service includes
-
WTSR Compliance Audits
An independent check of whether the rules are followed in practice, not just published.
-
WTSR Breach Investigations
What happened after a breach or near miss, why the system allowed it, and what has to change.
-
RAMS & Safe System of Work Reviews
Risk Assessments and Method Statements checked against the safety rules.
-
Operational Assurance Consultancy
Ongoing assurance across interfaces, handovers, records and the gaps between parties.
What an audit covers
Scope is agreed up front and varies with the asset and the operating model. A typical audit looks at:
Findings are ranked by risk, each with a practical route to closing it.
- Document suite currency and fit to the assets
- Authorisation records, appointments and depth of cover
- Permit, isolation and earthing practice in the field
- Contractor onboarding and interface management
Our Audit Process
From scope to closed finding
Agree the scope
What is being audited, against what, and what a useful answer looks like for the people who commissioned it.
01
Read the system
The document suite, authorisation records, permits and RAMS as they stand, before anyone is watched working.
02
Go and look
Site visits and discussions with the people who apply the rules.
03
Report the findings
Written plainly and ranked by risk, separating what breaches the rules from what is simply out of date.
04
Support the fix
We stay involved through the corrections, whether that means a rewrite, retraining or a change in practice.
05
Audit and investigation
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
The document suite, authorisation records and appointments, permit and isolation practice in the field, and how contractors are onboarded and managed. Scope is agreed with you up front.
Minimal. Most of the work is document review and discussion. Site time is arranged around operations.
A written report, findings ranked by risk, and a practical route to closing each one. Separated clearly into what breaches the rules and what is simply out of date.
Yes. Structured investigation into what happened, why the system permitted it, and what has to change.
Yes. Risk Assessments and Method Statements are reviewed against the safety rules, so the paperwork and the plant agree with each other.